Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It was effectively quashed but not debunked:

  https://www.cato.org/blog/mueller-report-faqs
  https://www.acslaw.org/projects/the-presidential-investigation-education-project/other-resources/key-findings-of-the-mueller-report/
I could go on and on but I don't think it would make a difference. It continues to boggle my mind that the GOP, a party that for all of my life had been an enemy of Russia turned around and embraced it. I wonder why.
 help



No it was debunked. It was always a conspiracy theory without evidence. I have read the Mueller report, it says no evidence was found of conspiracy (collusion). I can do better than regurgitating links at you and making handwaving claims about how I could go on and on, I can quote you verbatim passages which say just that.

Where is all that "ample evidence" that Adam Schiff, as chair House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, repeatedly claimed to have seen that provided Trump colluded with Putin to hack the election? He has seen it all, it's an open and shut case, so why did he go so quiet about it? Did Putin get to him too?

Obviously he has nothing and never did.

I've pressed people for specifics about this, and the only "evidence" they have been able to provide is Trump's "Russia if you're listening" speech, which is an obvious joke.


> I have read the Mueller report, it says no evidence was found of conspiracy (collusion).

You absolutely did not read the report, you listened to Barr’s brief lie about what was in it. There were endless examples of collusion and people in Trump’s inner circle found guilty of collaborating with the Russian government.

Let me guess, you also think Paul Manafort did nothing wrong?

https://www.acslaw.org/projects/the-presidential-investigati...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: