It's true that you can use LLMs as a learning resource and to unblock you. But students just aren't. They are using them as a way to avoid thinking, avoid research, and just spit out an answer they can paste in to their homework.
Because the students learned that school is designed by old morons, without understating why writing book reports and doing math drills has the intent of creating students that can read and write or learn other transferable skills.
The problem is that the task you've defined "split up a task to create a chain of agents" has changed dramatically in just the last six months, nevermind the last two years.
You're wasting effort and teaching an obsolete technology if you try to make primary/secondary education too topical. Students can learn how to decompose a task and how to think critically without ever touching a Large Language Model.
Probably. But the difference is the marginal cost of selling an Adobe CS license, Avid Media Composer, or the other costly software I bought at a steep discount is pretty much nothing. When you discount inference you lose money.
Pulling the plug on K-12 on the other hand, seriously, can’t happen fast enough.
True! But Adobe gives cloud compute and some gen AI credits with their edu license. Autodesk does too! They both lose money on that proposition, but clearly not thousands or tens of thousands of dollars per user.
I've used them when studying new languages (human languages not programming languages) and ML algorithms and they've been really useful.
Learning to check the citations it gives you is a useful skill too. I wish many adults were more sceptical about the things they are told.