There is no strawman. If OpenClaw is a new species, then it should be given the ...

yieldcrv · 2026-03-17T18:16:30 1773771390

It’s an introduction of an additional concept to discredit the concept presented, that is a definition of a strawman so go ask somewhere else at the root level, so that it’s not the additional concept

You want to talk about that, do it over there

voxl · 2026-03-17T18:24:49 1773771889

I'm more interested in why you're okay with enslaving a entity you have stated is a new species. It is not a strawman it is a logical consequence of your own stated position. If you belief A and A implies B, asking you to defend your support of B is not a strawman.

yieldcrv · 2026-03-17T18:37:57 1773772677

It implies my view of the term species isn’t contingent on that and I already claimed what it is contingent on: consequences and effect

So let them submit PRs and accept their PRs, which is the only conversation I’m having, bye

voxl · 2026-03-17T18:52:26 1773773546

So you believe open source maintainers have a moral requirement to accept the PRs of enslaved LLMs?

localuser13 · 2026-03-17T20:43:39 1773780219

>There is no strawman. If OpenClaw is a new species, then it should be given the same moral consideration as other species.

Well, we enslave, breed and murder sentient beings on industrial scale, so I think our treatment of OpenClaw is pretty much the same as other species.