Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What happened? We collectively over the course of time decided that the individual right not to be “harassed”, valid or not, overrides the ability to behave in such a manner. That happened because other officers proved they could not be trusted to exercise such power responsibly. “Being a nuisance” is a toe-length away from “harassing an ordinary citizen” when you don’t actually have proof. So, harassing a citizen to gain proof in order to prove it wasn’t harassment has an obvious problem.
 help



Is that really the case though? I'm not really sure I can think of any major cultural shifts or specific incidences that have changed Canadian law enforcement in the way that you describe.

How did these kinds of things happen in Canada and how do they relate specifically to bill C-22?


Bad apples…

Yeah, it’s what happened. It’s not what has to happen.


> Bad apples…

As always, if you are going to use this expression, you should be required to complete it.

Remind me: what do bad apples do?


spoils the bunch



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: