That would be authorship, no? | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		freejazz 47 days ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: AI-generated art can’t be copyrighted after Suprem... That would be authorship, no?

circuit10 46 days ago [–]

It sounds like they might be under the impression that having any AI-generated output in the code even if parts are human authored would invalidate the copyright, which isn’t true

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact