Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'd argue Ladybird itself is a "hype" project.


Anything trying to break the browser monopolies in a meaningful way deserves the hype, IMO.


  > monopolies
sorry to be pedantic but, do you mean perhaps oligopolies? and by that do you mean marketshare or technology share? i'm just curious what people are looking for in ladybird (just better tech or better or governance?)


Fair point. What does Ladybird need to achieve in your opinion to shake the "hype" label? Honestly, I, myself, don't have a good answer!


To me, a project's "hype-ness" is the ratio of how much attention it gets over how useful it actually is to users.

As a browser, Ladybird usefulness is currently quite limited for obvious reasons. This is not meant to dismiss its achievements, nor to overlook the fact that building a truly useful browser for everyday users is something few open source teams can accomplish without the backing of a billion dollar company. Still, in its present state, its practical utility remains limited.


> As a browser, Ladybird usefulness is currently quite limited for obvious reasons

By this definition all basic research is hype.


No, not necessarily. It's the ratio and for most basic research the numerator of the fraction is also approaching zero.


Yes, necessarily. Basic research is currently useless in the same way building something that hasn’t been built is currently useless.


Good verdict. I agree.

Ladybird will have to deliver eventually - on this part I think many people agree with.


> What does Ladybird need to achieve in your opinion to shake the "hype" label?

A release (?)


Somehow people manage to run it without this magical release


I mean you can build and try Ladybird for yourself. I posted on HN from it a while back.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: