Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>the people who were all against copyright previously became ardent supporters of it overnight.

Oh, no, no. You misunderstand my friend. I might loosely be called one of those who was anti-copyright, but turn my desire to see it's draconian enforcement cranked up to 11 on corporations. I believe fundamental reform is necessary, however, if you're running a for profit enterprise, and have not in good faith with the laws of of the land, which let's be clear, AI companies absolutely haven't; there is no mercy deserved. If a grandma or teen can get saddled with life ruining punitive damages for something as innocent as filesharing, then these companies should not exist in any way shape or form in a functioning justice system as currently configured. That they do illustrates the woeful state of our State.

Things need to change.



>If a grandma or teen can get saddled with life ruining punitive damages for something as innocent as filesharing

That's the same thing these corporations were found guilty of though. Or well, maybe not even that, since it was about downloading copyrighted material, not necessarily sharing:

https://www.npr.org/2025/09/05/g-s1-87367/anthropic-authors-...

>The company has agreed to pay authors about $3,000 for each of an estimated 500,000 books covered by the settlement.


Which on the sliding scale of means is bullshit. And I'm pretty sure Grandma/Little Jimmy didn't get the option to negotiate.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: