Either I’m missing a joke or you’re being very unnecessarily rude. Hoping it’s the former.

He's basically trying to say don't fully put your trust in any LLM, even one of the top ones. As you can see from an adjacent comment from someone who speaks the language, it's a closer translation but still not quite right.

> Seems so. I typed in a lowered version now, gives good translation "частный машинный перевод, работая локально на вашем устройстве". (The one you got is a little clumsy ~ "translation of machines")

If you don't know something, then just say you don't know. Deferring to an LLM just comes across as low-effort and irrelevant.

He is right, you don't confirm that an LLM works well by comparing it to the result of another LLM.

As with many things spread by the Internet, I think it's just lowered the bar (and the effort) for participation. But the brains are the same.