Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't think that they were confused or in denial about whether it was necessary for purposes of a legal requirement. It seems that they were agnostic on that, and saying that it would be better if the law itself didn't require that emotional distress be asserted and proven.


My mistake. Looks like I can’t edit or delete my post at this point unfortunately.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: