Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Ah, the `intmax_t` problem is a fun one. Perhaps it should never have been introduced.


Yes, for the most part intmax_t (and similar guarantees) is considered a mistake.

In C++, the next mistake is going to be the hardware_{constructive,destructive}_interference_size constants that have serious ABI implications. I think that current GCC position is that they are not part of the ABI and they are subject to change (but also controllable from the command line).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: