Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

As I see it, a CoC is a tool for those in power to better exert their influence and control. If those in power are just and competent then it's a tool for good. If those in power are selfish or unskilled then it's a tool for ill. Unfortunately, I suspect the latter is much more often the case than the former.


Indeed. I think CoC is kind of like any other form of "justice". One thing I dislike about them, is most seem to emphasize secrecy (To protect the accuser, and the accused). And they aren't wrong to worry about protecting those parties. However, in the real world, having transparency in court cases, is one the core checks on the power of the judiciary that prevent it from being abused.


> As I see it, a CoC is a tool

It's a tool for communicating expectations of behavior. There's nothing wrong about managing expectations. Think of it as the next level "no shoes, no shirt, no service".

Unfortunately, tools can be abused, and this case was no exception. It doesn't mean that the tool should be discarded, it should be refined.


Except these are "unless you are wearing what someone else doesn't find offensive".

This requires a fashion sense that keeps 100% of people happy enough not to report you.


> Except these are "unless you are wearing what someone else doesn't find offensive".

Interesting. I didn't see that example in the article -- could you cite such an example or are you just making something up?


I'm referring to your use of the dress code. Unlike the clearly written "No shoes, No Shirt - No Service" sign, the "sign" in this case is the relative offensiveness of ones behaviour.

You just have to be offensive to "any single person" to trigger the "no service" condition.


It's a matter of degree, isn't it? At some point there's clearly a threshold of unacceptable behavior right?

The trick is to have that threshold be at a "reasonable" level. That's tricky and has room for error, but it doesn't mean it's not worth doing.

Note that my original response was to this statement: "As I see it, a CoC is a tool for those in power to better exert their influence and control."

We need guidelines for group activities, and they need to evolve as we learn more about the world, and framing this as a tool for power tripping is "the elites".

From the article, it appears that the "rules" were not well communicated and/or were poorly enforced. Blaming it on having a CoC vs. a person making poor choices is what I'm pushing back against.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: