I like how the best way to protest this is by doing what everyone should have been doing to begin with: running a great open source model on rented hardware

I love how all the public critique about not being able to see stars in nasa photos has resulted in better dynamic range photography and composition

just the lowest hanging fruit that had been a second class citizen to the marvel of having an extraterrestrial angle to begin with

I love the multipronged attack on RAG

RIP RAG: lasted one year at a skillset that recruiters would list on job descriptions, collectively shut down by industry professionals

this is a beautiful attack, the way that multisig signers were compromised with innocuous signatures in advance, without really compromising private keys

from the pre-funding to a virgin address, to the bundler, to the exit strategy to decentralized assets

to the protocols exposed but functioning perfectly under the stress test - props to Jupiter! - and the optional insurance protocols functioning decently, all while people point fingers at Circle for their bridge working perfectly, it's not even clear what people want them to do specifically! All of these aspects of web3 are working great, and it's easy for a cynic that only sees these headlines to miss that

inspirational, great place to build

> SOC2 won't catch this

Cybersecurity professionals and their certification treadmill crack me up because of this

They get paid less, require more certifications to be marketable, all to simply show actual “computer wizards” where all the blind spots are

I am not disagreeing with your main point, but want to clarify that SOC2 is not an individual certification that a person achieves.

At least these are IDEs with the save button finally gone

We needed that jump, there were still floppy disk icons

states should remove the "purpose" field of incorporation statutes, its too antiquated now and for half a century

well, I still want to use it but the first day i tried openclaw + opus, it costs me ~$500...

if it works it works

we live in a wholly unoptimized world because the available resources have been so high, while the benefits of optimizing have been so low. that has flipped now and there are tons of low hanging fruit to optimize.

I agree that benchmarks would be great, but thats only relevant to this one topic, not the overall agentic coded pull request concept itself

It's relevant in that it's an example that people are doing the easy part - the coding - and skipping the hard part - the benchmarking and proving it works and provides value.

A PR without evidence it works and expectations for the benefits using the new feature would bring is kind of worthless.

It might work, but what's the point is sharing it if anyone can do the same in those 30 minutes with minimal effort?

Who says it works if the “author” isn’t thoroughly testing and reviewing it?

People who do this want the fun part of pretending they’re implementing a feature without actually putting in the hard work it takes to make something for real.

They want the repo maintainers to do all the hard, boring parts while they have fun. As if maintainers of open source projects don’t have enough thankless work on their plates. Good luck with that!

developers are far too pedantic to make a mistake like that

sometimes imposter syndrome is completely because you are an interloper

I question this 10x dev that OP was talking to