The opposite is true, actually.

you cannot be serious. wtf?

Wait the FTC is suing Mozilla?

>Not sure who determines the threshold

The SEC.

>he certainly goes to court more than your average person

Yes because he sues a lot of entities for silly things such as some advertisers declining to buy ads that display next to pro-hitler posts, or news outlets for posting unaltered screenshots of a social media site he acquired.

aaand he never replied

It is like they're brainwashed. Awful.

You have clearly not actually read the opinion being discussed and have resorted to outright lying about what it says. Please stop it.

Have you actually read the SC opinion or are you just assuming what it says? It is apparently the latter.

>No he can't because this is against the law

What exactly do you think immunity makes someone immune from?

Do you think immunity is for lawful things? Why on earth are you arguing that unlawful acts are not covered by immunity? What exactly do you think immunity makes someone immune from?

No it hasn't.