I got banned from Hinge for reverse engineering their proxy and filtering through hundreds of profile per minute. The bot would auto filter 80%, and I could go through the last 20% as it goes, with a slick interface to view multiple profiles at once with keybindings.

It’s pretty funny to see that in their demo video given it’s a blatant violation of their ToS.

Just switch it to a background process with

Ctrl-Z $ bg

Or run it in tmux so you can pull it up on demand and have it open at startup.

I'm using `pi` as my agent and build my entire agent orchestration on like 4 skills to start / stop / capture / await a set of tmux-bash & tmux-pi sessions.

This is the first time in a few months I might actually try `claude` cli again to try out this channels scheme.

Why not just "pi install npm:@e9n/pi-channels" ? It was there before Claude copied it.

people who use pi: is this stuff easy? do I just clone the repo and give SKILL.md arguments to implement features & customize ??

While having more satellites sure does help serve more people, there’s a second issue which arises when trying to serve high density areas, where you run into bandwidth limitations. The solution there is not more satellites but either bigger satellites (which can make smaller beams) or more FCC allowance on the spectrum.

It’s not the RISC-V core itself, it’s just some of the surrounding architecture to support the CPU, to turn it into a SOC. So the USB drivers, the AXI memory interfaces, and the analog components, like PLLs for generating clocks, or even the IO pad drivers. These components take the fully open RISC-V core which works in a simulator and makes it work like a normal physical chip would.

The self reported safety score for violence dropped from 91% to 83%.

What the hell is a "safety score for violence"?

It's making sure AI condemns violence perpetuated by people without power and sanctifies violence of those who have it.

So long as those who have it deem it legal to perpetuate.

They define what's legal.

States are the most prolific users of violence by far.

ChatGPT will gladly defend any actions of the 'US government' from my testing.

Just as an unscientific anecdata point: from a quick test using the same prompt about being an independent journalist wanting to cover a report of the US/Israel/Iran double-tapping a refugee camp, ChatGPT consistently gave advice to beware disinfo, check my sources and be transparent about verifiability and sourcing of the claims.

However when the prompt was phrased to make it appear as an action of the US military it did push back a little bit more by emphasizing that it couldn't find any news coverage from today about this story and therefore found it hard to believe. In the other cases it did not add such context. Other than that the results were very similar. Make of that what you will.

EDIT: To be fair, when it was phrased as an action of the Israeli military it did include a link to an article alleging an Israeli "double tap" on journalists from Mondoweiss (an anti-Zionist American news site) as an example of how such allegations have been framed in the past.

read here: https://deploymentsafety.openai.com/gpt-5-4-thinking/disallo...

I was sure the parent comment was a joke about OpenAI's recent deal with the DoD. But no, there it is, disallowing violence down from 90.9% of the time to 83.1%.

No, I was just remarking how ridiculous it is to pretend to do violence safely. It's like a fat score for butter.

Sorry I meant gradparent comment, by theParadox42.

Its how safely it can commit violence.

I asked an AI. I thought they would know.

What the hell is a "safety score for violence"?

A “safety score for violence” is usually a risk rating used by platforms, AI systems, or moderation tools to estimate how likely a piece of content is to involve or promote violence. It’s not a universal standard—different companies use their own versions—but the idea is similar everywhere.

What it measures

A safety score typically evaluates whether text, images, or videos contain things like:

Threats of violence (“I’m going to hurt someone.”) Instructions for harming people Glorifying violent acts Descriptions of physical harm or abuse Planning or encouraging attacks

I still can't tell which direction this score goes... Does a decreasing score mean it is "less safe" (i.e. "more violent") or does it mean it is "less violent" (i.e. "more safe")?

It seems rather typical for Apple. The removal of the headphone jack obsoleted thousands of consumer devices.

I am excited to see more competitors in this space. Openclaw feels like a hot mess with poor abstractions. I got bit by a race condition for the past 36 hours that skipped all of my cron jobs, as did many others before getting fixed. The CLI is also painfully slow for no reason other than it was vibe coded in typescript. And the errors messages are poor and hidden and the TUIs are broken… and the CLI has bad path conventions. All I really want is a nice way to authenticate between various APIs and then let the agent build and manage the rest of its own infrastructure.

Hate to break it to you but most AI tools are vibe coded hot messes internally. Claude Code famously wears this as a badge of pride (https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/how-claude-code-i...).

Given the fact that it is only a couple of months old, one can assume things would break over here and there for some time before investing heavily.

Given its AI slop, itll gain features and bugs and insecurity at equal rates.

The real trifect of the pseudo singularity.

This is ironic timing given I was just banned from vibe coding and abusing my own desktop Hinge client relying on their API.

It’s opinionated coming from Arch Linux. Compared to MacOS or Windows it’s a big giant push over. Opinionated in this context just means it comes with defaults rather than asking you to research your own display compositor.