Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | subscribed's commentslogin

Oh, we'll get the partial ban too, no worries.

This is not a "ban" for children bill, that's a deanonymization/censorship bill.


It'll probably always confirm it's been verified.

GOS have already said users won't be impacted by this clampdown.


So F-Droid will be installable without sacrificing livestock?

"We"? Not sure how your friends group looks like but I'm very glad i don't belong to it.

- which one is to stop you from hammering small servers with hundreds simultaneous connections?

- why don't you just respect existing robots.txt that apply to you already?

- does every LLM scraper seriously think the onus to opt out from the EVERY SINGLE SCRAPER is on the webmasters/owners?


Just respect the bloody robots.txt and hold your horses. Ask your precious product built on the relentless, hostile scraping to devise a strategy that doesn't look like a cancer growth.

Mostof the people I met outside work wouldn't understand this concept.

I think you're lucky to hang around people whose heads don't hurt when they think.


This is indeed what I do. And you also should. Separate browser for banking, trusted shipping sites etc, and the normal one.

Make sure not to browse the Internet without adblock and/or similar.


> "abuse like bots, scraping"

You what, mate? Would you please use that on yourselves first? Because it comes off as a GROSS hypocrisy. State of the art hypocrisy.

>> behavioral biometric layer

But this one, especially, takes the cake.

Quite disgusting.


So, if at the end of the day instead of clicking EVERY single link in the repository they just check it out and parse locally...... I would consider it a win.

Many of these people live int he countries where downloading for own use is lawful, since they're paying copyright levy exactly to cover for that.

They don't have to hate the copyright.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: