Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | some_random's commentslogin

Don't worry, the multipolar world you dream of will be here soon, and it will be as brutal and violent as you're hoping.

> Don't worry, the multipolar world you dream of will be here soon, and it will be as brutal and violent as you're hoping.

... I don't hope for that?


Deepfakes were never necessary, people have been making incredible propaganda forever though the same few tactics. For instance, presenting footage out of context.

Most commenters in this thread.

Cue dozens of comments doing exactly that...

It is, but that's not a useful or insightful thing to say

It's not an insightful statement right now, but it was at the peak of cloud hype ca. 2010, when "the cloud" often used in a metaphorical sense. You'd hear things like "it's scalable because it's in the cloud" or "our clients want a cloud based solution." Replacing "the cloud" in those sorts of claims with "another person's computer" showed just how inane those claims were.

No, it doesn't at all. "it's scalable because it's in the cloud" may be reductive nonsense or it could be true. It's scalable because it's on someone elses computer and in a matter of minutes it can be on one of their computers with twice the ram and vCPUs. That is a meaningful thing to say when the alternative is CAPEX heavy investment in your own infrastructure. Same with "our clients want a cloud based solution" in contrast with on-prem installs. They don't want your shitty pizza box in their closet, they want someone else to be doing the hosting.

Are you sure about that?

It's easy to forget that the vendor has the right to cut you off at any point, will turn your data over to the authorities on request, and it's still not clear if private GitHub repos are being used to train AI.


Two of these are basic contractual problems, your company should have a lawyer who can sort them out easily. The third (data being turned over to authorities) is something that the vast majority of companies do not care about in the slightest.

People pass around stickers (or at least used to) in hacker events saying that so there has to be something to it, right?

Protesting the term is, I'd wager, motivated by something like: it sounds innocuous to nontechnical people and obscures what's really going on.


Only if owning the means of your production isn't important to you

It was really easy to support when tech jobs were plentiful, well compensated, and fun.

And before large language models.

Supply and demand is fake when it suggests something I don't like, what's so hard to understand?

That's not really what they said though, they said their quality of life was going down due to visa holders, which I have not seen any proof of.

You advertise in small circulation newspapers, I thought this was well known.

Another trick I've seen on LinkedIn is job applications open from 12:00 am to 12:01 am.

The employer can legally say they advertized the job and had no applicants and need an H1B employee.


that's not how it works- they have to have the petition up for a period of time for it be considered valid.

I think you're massively overestimating the amount of control the US has over news broadcasters.

>Not to mention the added bonus of the collapse of the US economy. Frankly, it’s well deserved. Nobody should build an economy based on rent seeking and increasing friction. I pray the collapse will be swift and legible so that reconstruction (in the right way) can begin as soon as possible.

Insane take for a bunch of reasons, the destruction of the US economy would necessarily entail the destruction of the world economy. Hopefully I don't have to explain why that would be bad. Furthermore, a ton of the "rent seeking" Citrini Research was discussing isn't traditional rent seeking but the cognitive services previously necessary. Software engineering, for instance, falls into that bucket.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: