Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | risyachka's commentslogin

Be careful though - telegram is heavily compromised.

e.g. their backend just 2 days ago (and since at least start of the year) was replacing referral links to amex (and i bet many other banks etc) with custom referral codes from russian guys (so when I sent my friend my referral link - it showed another referral link in out chat history on both ends). and their security team says its all good.

so unless you are using it for useless info - better use something else.


Was this on a desktop? I'd think it's far more likely malware or a browser extension is hijacking your clipboard

please provide a proof. if this is the case, then telegram is not to be trusted. but it needs to be proven. otherwise a lot of people trust their business and personal data to telegram.

Do you have a proof?

What even is this claim? Telegram is compromised? Some telegram bot/group got compromised?

Is there any proof of the global telegram issue related to amex links? Sounds like BS


Are you using any custom telegram client?

i say cap

> Tell us your hopes and dreams for a Cloudflare-wide CLI

Please call it flare.


I was the original author of the cloudflare-go library (which I worked on in my spare time while working at Cloudflare), and I included a `flarectl` command with it, but sadly it didn't get much traction :-(

https://github.com/cloudflare/cloudflare-go/tree/v0/cmd/flar...


>> how do you think about defensibility?

defensibility nowadays is app support and development. the more work you pour into it the more defensible it will be.

I personally would gladly pay to have app constantly polished and improved. What I would not use is some vibe-coded alternative that was slopped with AI in a day and pushed to github with a tweet "i made a free X alternative" and then abandoned.


I would not.

I'm not paying $40 for a taskbar replacement. And not for two years of updates and a two device limit on top.

Maybe if it was $10, I could consider it. Prices for macOS apps are insane in my opinion. Everyone wants to charge yearly or every two years now too.


I second this! As a lite Mac user, $40 is a bit steep. I'll manage without boringBar no matter how great it is.

Honestly, I have tried to really cut down on my usage of 3rd-party dependencies when possible. In a way, it's kind of freeing. Whatever I still need, I write myself. If I cannot write it, then I try to find something FOSS. If I find nothing, then I consider purchasing something.

For example, I am rolling my own window manager (that needs some much needed TLC). I ditched Alfred for Spotlight. Though Alfred is better, I will survive just fine. And the list goes on.

I am not trying to take a dig at the OP. I am sure he or she put effort into this application. But I am genuinely curious -- does anybody actually need this software? Cmd+Tab, a decent window manager, and Spotlight would solve the same problems for free.


I fresh install to give myself a different perspective when I feel like I have too many 3rd party solutions to problems that no longer exist. Spotlight is better and I only casually use my macbook nowadays, so I don't need the power of Alfred. I don't need dock extensions because Stage Manager is mediocre but works well enough for the browser, chat / music apps, and whatever document I'm working with at the time.

They’re not insane.

It costs $99 a year just to be able to write Mac apps at all.

Any sort of buy-once app on macOS is unsustainable to the developer. They are paying Apple $99 a year forever.

If you want cheap/free apps get off of Apple’s ecosystem and switch to Linux.


Seconded. $10 for 2y and Id buy.. otherwise it feels too steep a price.

Agree

how much is there to improve and polish for a taskbar? at most it will be keeping up with macOS throwing breaking changes at you and maybe one or the other weird bug.

but isn't that it?


>> apparently a bug?

it's a bug only if they get a harsh public response, otherwise it becomes a feature


A bug for one side can be a feature for another

It will be hard to convince them otherwise when their jobs are replaced with AI, and they are in their late 40s or later - with no time to adjust and to learn new craft.

They or them? It's all of us I'd bet.

Yeah I kinda agree. Considering llms write most of the code today, the need for fancy tech is lower than ever. A good old crud app looks like a perfect fit for ai - its simple, repetitive and ai is great at sql. Go binary for backend and react for frontend - covers 99.9% use cases with basically zero resource usage. 5 usd node will handle 100k mau without breaking a sweat.

> 5 usd node will handle 100k mau without breaking a sweat.

One problem you may encounter with the 5 usd node: how do you handle multiple projects? You could put them all in one VM, but that set up can get esoteric, and as you look for more isolation, the processes won't fit on such a small machine.

With Instant, you can make unlimited projects. Your app also gets a sync engine, which is both good for your users, and at least in our experiments, the AIs prefer building with it.

And if you ever want to get off Instant, the whole system is open source.

I still resonate with a good Hetzner box though, and it can make sense to self-host or to use more tried-and-true tech.

For what it's worth, with Instant you would get a lot more support for easy projects. At least in our benchmarks, AI


Like any company they will squeeze the usage as much as they possibly can. There is not a little chance that prices can be 1k+ so only enterprises can allow coding subs.Those who have ROI will pay for it.

Current phase of usage/pricing is just testing the waters. Especially considering they are the market leader in this category.


Now new model looks so much better though on benchmarks!

It doesn’t really matter how good your taste is if you are drowning in the ocean of crap.

Customers can’t find you


This is an underrated comment. You could have the best product out there, but AI has not only lowered the effort for competitors but has flooded traditional ways to get your product known, from outbound sales to content marketing. Sometimes make you question whether there are customers anymore.

the time to freak out was 2 years ago.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: