What makes this better than having two full browser windows side by side?

The same reason people like tmux or split-pane terminals? Seriously, the amount of negative spins this thread attracted for a useful and harmless feature like this is weird.

If you want to switch back and forth between "these two web things side-by-side" and "something else" over and over, then in that case it's better than two full browser windows side-by-side because they come into the foreground and vice versa as a unit.

It is a bit of a continuation of the somewhat annoying trend of integrating features into apps that should be part of the window manager (tabs, in the first place, for example). This one is extra awkward because even windows (which has spent a lot of time behind on window management) can do two things side by side as the same unit now.

I've found myself wanting something like this since I switched to the new built-in vertical tabs, as it's a pain to get rid of them temporarily in side-by-side windows.

It means the content of two tabs is side by side but nothing else like the browser chrome. Haven't used this in Firefox yet, but I certainly find it useful for other apps like file browsers.

Huh? There's actually more stuff in the way than if you used two windows since the divider is actually larger than the gap between windows is.

The only way this saves on space is if you're using vertical tabs.

Whatever? I too prefer two windows side by side and I don't see this feature useful, but if others do, that's great.

The only place I've found it useful is when screen sharing and I have to show two tabs side by side, but I don't want to share my entire desktop.

Try it out. It is ok to not like it.

They just need to type faster

In the dark with a mask on

While drinking Brawndo.

It's a very handy fea-ccccccvklhfgjhckcnkdnhgkcdgbruuhlfbuednrjgjr-ture

It can be a little touchy.hunter2

Why'd you just type a bunch of asterisks?

You all have made me realize that bash.org is no longer around. Thanks for the trip down memory lane :)

My pet peeves. One of the top 5 was fake. It had a typo in the server message.

You know what's funny is that, at least by default, these strings have some information in them that tells you the serial number and model of the key, among other things.

gesundheit

"Mines only spawn on water" is a bit confusing; there are no clickable tiles that are fully on land, but tiles that touch land can also have mines. So I'm not sure what that is telling me.

Double clicking on a tile doesn't seem to do anything different than a single click (Firefox on macOS)

Oh, I see - double clicking only works when you have already marked the correct number of adjacent mines. I didn't remember that's how it worked in the original.

I also never knew it was called "chording", that's worth an explanation.

iPhone user here, the toggle button works but it’s a pain to have to keep scrolling back to it to toggle when you are zoomed in

That seems like a reductive way to consider it. What percent of music was created by Led Zeppelin? What percent of art was painted by Monet? What percent of films by Alfred Hitchcock? It may be a small percentage objectively but they are hugely influential.

I don't think back propagation care whose text it is back propagating.

The data sets aren't naively fed into the training runs.

Instead, training attempts to sample more heavily from higher quality sources, with, I'm sure, a mix of manual and heuristic labeling.

fwiw, no llm ive ever used generated in the writing style newspapers and -sites use - hence i honestly doubt they've been given a meaningful boost in relevancy.

their idioms would leak occasionally otherwise

They claim to have rolled out 4000 fast chargers so far.

Although it also says the car that supports the max charging speed hasn’t hit the market yet so seems yet to be proven in the wild.

Neither article really explains how they are able to charge this fast, aside from “vertical integration” and slightly increased energy density in the battery design. No real details on the charging technology itself.

BYD did not go to specifics about their blade 2.0 battery that enables this, but there has to be battery chemistry and manufacturing advancements. CATL shared some details on their 12C LFP batteries before, they lowered li-ion mobility resistance, increased how the anode and cathode can accept more li-ions at faster rates. Another improvement for blade 2.0 battery is the charge curve is much better. 80 - 90 % can have much higher charging rates.

Sounds like the trick is to use 1.5MW chargers. I guess that'll do it. I suppose the question is how they handel this thermally.

there needs to be battery chemistry improvements. Otherwise, with existing batteries, charging at these speeds will cause too much heat and shorten battery life span. BYD is offering 1.5MW charging with increased battery lifespan and without increasing the heat dissipation requirements. Another improvement compared to current crop of batteries is charge curve. Charging from 80 to 95%, BYD batteries can handle higher power than current batteries at MAX

Is this even as fast as the existing CATL tech? It seems to just be where batteries are heading through a bunch of small improvements over time.

This is mentioned in the article:

> But the airplane never became popular—although it became briefly famous when a heavily made-up example starred in 1985’s Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome.

I was referring to the copter pilot in the road warrior, same scrappy tininess.

beyond thunderdome was the next in the series.

Ah, I was getting my bodged-up post-apocalyptic Aussie aerial transports mixed up