Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | logicchains's commentslogin

>I also want Claude to work reliably but very few (no?) companies have ever seen this level of rapid growth. We're going to go through a long fail-whale-style period and I can imagine very, very few companies that could avoid that.

Their main competitor OpenAI has much better uptime and more generous usage limits.


Exactly this. OpenAI is running huge workloads silently, without anybody patting their back.

https://www.huawei.com/en/news/2026/3/mwc-superpod-ai

>For AI computing, the Atlas 950 SuperPoD, powered by UnifiedBus, integrates 64 NPUs per cabinet and can scale up to 8,192 NPUs, delivering superior performance for large-scale AI training and high-concurrency inference.


Try Codex, it's a breath of fresh air in that regard, tries to do as much as it can.

This isn't new; in the 1960s France sent ships to take back its gold from the US to avoid losing it.

We'd only expect to see wage equality if women had exactly the same job preferences as men, which empirically is absolutely not the case.

To whoever downvoted this, I'd be interested to see your sources showing that women do in fact have the same job preferences as men. Because every study I've seen shows that their career preferences differ. Or do you genuinely not understand that if women on average have a preferences for fields that pay less, they'll earn less on average?

I think the argument is the other way around: fields that women prefer pay less, ie. the field pays less because women prefer it.

I don’t share that argument, I just wanted to point it out.


Or alternatively, men prefer careers because they pay more, regardless of other criteria, so they choose high paying fields more often.

Why do those careers pay less?

How far away are we from being able to run a hobby Linux on something like that, a completely hardware-backdoor-free system?

You can already port over a RISC-V SoC to Aegis. I have not tested that yet but it is something I really want to do.

You can already do that on several Risc-V chips with mmu.

Not everybody has such a troubled personality that having the ability right at their fingertips to access all the world's information and communicate with anyone in the world somehow causes them problems, maybe you should touch grass.

No, he's right. Smartphones are a socio-demographic catastrophe. The fact that they exasperate mental illnesses is just a detail.

Welcome to Dubai, German habibis, you can join all the Russians fleeing their draft here. Still a lot less likely to get hit by a drone here than to die when fighting on the frontlines in Europe.

We are indeed evolving into a situation where Islamic monarchies not only sound reasonable but start to look like a viable option.

*As long as you're part of a privileged, accepted class

White European is enough? how rich do I have to be?

Islamic societies could be the only ones that will be left standing after all these nonsense we see in the west.

I would bet my money on asian societies.

I don't know. A lot of countries in East Asia seem to struggle demographically just as much as Western countries do, if not more.

But at least it seems they didn't go for the easy solutions that is mass immigration, so hopefully their children's "seats" won't be taken when they finally wake up.

On the other hand, as someone living in Central Europe, it's obvious our society is heading towards a radical change. I don't know what will happen, but I don't recall ever reading about a indigenous population becoming a minority being a good thing for them.


I think its more about a rotten ideology and mass migration is only a symptom. Also it could make sense if you would actually care about taking people that are educated and willing to work.

Why would someone go to a place in an actual conflict zone that is under attack by actual drones right now to flee from hypothetical drones in a hypothetical conflict?

They just told you why. The probability of being hit by a drone there is extremely low.

No crazier than that the old can vote to send the young to war.

A little crazier — the old were once young, and could have been voted into a war themselves.

Trans people exist. So: Some women were treated by law as "once men, and could have been voted into a war themselves

Footnote: But not necessarily felt to be correctly labeled men, ever in life.


Body dysmorphia is a mental illness.

And yet the vast majority of combat veterarans are very anti-war.

Which combat veterans?

My grandpa (ww2) was one of them. He helped my father dodge the draft, when he was supposed to go to military service.

Why don’t presidents fight the war; why do they always send the poor?

"Fuck you got mine" is the attitude of the boomers expecting young people to die for a country that the boomers left economically and demographically ruined. Young Germans have the worst life prospects of any generation in the past fifty years.

But if you look at serious polls then not many young people will actually fight for this. I remember reading a number of around 15%... And those probably don't have a high IQ.

That's a generation of people who had to never suffer the prospect of invasion and occupation of German soil by hostile armed forces. Even so, this number of willing recruits would already be much more than the Bundeswehr can possibly arm, and are unneeded as long as there is no military altercation actively involving Germany.

You're discussing boomers in the context of an awful lot of history.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: