Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | keepamovin's commentslogin

I can’t accept the theocratic tyrants who implement terrorism, execute their own people and slaughter them as they protest remain in charge. They should be forced out of power.

I wonder if the US had struck when momentum was high during the popular uprising, it could have being self sustaining, with arms and logistics setup to feed the resistance advance.


Your post is ambiguous until the second part, FYI. In this conflict, it's a good idea to be clear on which nation you are talking about from the start.

The delusional idea that one can affect regime change through bombing is the cause of quite a bit death and destruction throughout the world.

Maybe the problem wasn't the timing, but the fact that thousands of people were killed and millions lived in fear for the future for the past month? That's enough to cause most people to stand behind their government, no matter how reviled they might be.


The second day of the war Israel gave everyone in Tehran a day-long oil shower. Imagine cleaning that out of your kid's hair, you're not going to overthrow the government that's shooting back.

Regime change with air invasion is unlikely.

The civilian casualties of the war is still significantly lower than the number killed by the regime (according to Amnesty International with conservative number). So while I agree that people don’t want bombing, I highly doubt that the war makes them like their oppressors. They love their country and Iran and islamic regime are not the same exactly.


The idea there was bombing to support the popular uprising that does the actual work. I think that might have been the fantasy here, too, but it seems like the window closed.

I guess you’re right. I was thinking a peoples army, armed by US logistics and calling in US air support.

But i guess you know more than i do


I'm not arguing that Iran has been executed well, but military force has topled MANY regimes. If you're arguing "bombs" specifically and only, the U.S. won the war with Japan by dropping just two big ones. If you'd like a more contemporary example: Libya, 2011. NATO’s campaign relied overwhelmingly on air and missile strikes, and NATO officially did not deploy a conventional foreign ground force. The regime was finished by Libyan rebel forces on the ground. This is likely the scenario Trump was hoping for.

Japan was on its last legs was and the US had already gone all-in with a war machine unlike anything seen before. At that point no one was going to lose elections about lost lives while invading Japan. The bombs were a time and life saving device. And the US army still had to actually occupy Japan after that (much smaller than Iran)

There was, and still is, no scenario in which US and/or Israel attacks Iran and effects regime change. Come on, we've been over this multiple times over the past few decades.

Any direct military action will galvanize population against the existential threat, not against the tyrant who's still your countryman, no matter how rotten.

If they wanted true change, grassroots support was the only way. Was, because at this point more than likely any revolution has been pushed back by a few years at least, probably decades.


I see your point. You don’t think most Iranians want freedom from tyrants? I see 90% dislike the tyrants, and 80% want Trump to eradicate them. Leveling the field for the popular revolution I hope takes over.

Iranian here, no we don't want Israel and United States to bomb our children to "free us".

We already have 90M intelligent people in the country and can figure it out eventually.

We still has ways to go to develop, IRAN lacks some women's rights (however it's not as bad as people make it to be) and freedom of speech (similar to other Gulf nations). Most people have major grievances regarding the economy.

After the uprising of "Woman, Life, Freedom" in 2022, followed by the Mahsa uprising, the government started to loosen the Hijab laws for example. They stopped enforcing it severely (though they can change it at any time), the clerics have realized that theocratic laws will backfire with young people. I think the future of Iran is going to look like other nations, where religion becomes a "cultural thing".

The biggest blockers at the moment are sanctions and the ongoing issues with Israel.

We've survived for 3,000 years, we can survive for another 3,000 years without the help of US.


How are you commenting? I thought the internet was turned off in Iran.

Murdering tens of thousands of protesters couple months ago, tho?

This is a very naive view. Things do not happen like that, especially in the Middle East, where killing a tinpot dictator just causes two more radical ones spring to usurp his place. We've been over this where US military interventions in this century alone caused ISIS to spread like wildfire, and make things worse long term in many of the countries affected.

I think some Iranians, perhaps even a vast majority of them, would like freedom from Khomenei, but the westerners have just conducted massive bombing operations, killing many innocent civilians at the behest of their mortal enemy Israel, so any freedom movements are at the very least very unpopular now, with people becoming radicalized by deaths of their loved ones, especially their children, pushing them into the arms of those in power, who can justifiably point and say "see? They are the enemy, not us!". One almost wonders if that wasn't also one of the goals of the invasion, preventing the formation of a secularized and stable Iran.


That’s OK, you may be right. And all my comments here on the Iranian situation may be wrong. Which is also perfectly okay because I don’t have to make any decisions affecting the Persian people.

Would you want Americans to take Trump down yourselves, or would rather China come and take him down for you? Iranians have as much agency as Americans do. Denying them that never ends well.

Iranians are not armed tho

I think the people in Gaza want freedom from tyrants.

It could be real. Or it could be a smokescreen for their remote viewing program. But isn’t the most likely explanation that pilots carry a radio/gps device and that’s how rescue found him?

If you were in charge of the deciding what should be done with Sam Altman, what would you choose?

I mean, its a fair question, though it does make some wonder how extreme the answers could be, so I could see why you're being downvoted.

The problem is sometimes on paper everything people like Sam Altman do is legal, despite it harming so many. We've literally had a major RAM producer pull off the consumer RAM market. I feel like Sam Altman should be investigated and heavily scrutinized. He kind of is the biggest bubble in the AI bubble, we're letting him fester too far into it too, and these circular deals have seemingly somewhat stopped for now, but it might only get worse.


Totally. Lying about others can be so harmful. But lying to hostiles in order to protect? Acceptable.

I guess my question was more, if the article author was the judge of fate or morality, what should happen?

As to AI and Sam, I think it’s too early to tell what effects will be. So we should adopt non judgement, build good ourselves and see what unfolds.


YC invests in people, not ideas. They have vetted him. They are always right about people. It's probably nothing.

Braille?

Yes this is a great methodology. I found developing BrowserBox (which is real time interactive streaming for remote browsers), using slow links, and a variety of different OS, really stresses parts of the system and causes improvements to be necessary that strengthen the whole.

Humans must expand through the solar system and beyond. Mars is an okay goal, but the moon is a better bet for living quarters for now.

Earth is a jewel, but we have to expand and explore. It's our destiny.

Ultimately you need to live underground on the Mars to avoid radiation.


I don't know about must expand but there are always going to be a few wanting to that.

I mean its a nice idea. But short of FTL/Wormholes there is never going to be a practical need to do this. If the sun goes supernova then perhaps it would happen but even then we would spend centuries in space terraforming planets to make them liveable,

Interesting. So you’re one of the ones who prefers email updates to a reader? What do you estimate that breaks down to %-wise of people?

my guess:

95% prefer email (anyone nontechnical)

5% prefer reader (a select group of technical people)


Thanks! Why do you think some technicals like readers?

I did a show hn a month or so back like this: https://hackerbook.dosaygo.com/

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46435308

https://github.com/DOSAYGO-STUDIO/HackerBook

The mods and community had no problem with it

Differences: Sharded SQLITE, used bigquery export, build script is open on GitHub, interactive “archived website” view of HN, updated weekly (each build takes a couple dollars on a custom GitHub runner)


@keepamovin thanks, your project was a big inspiration for this.

I built my own pipeline with a slightly different setup. I use Go to download and process the data, and update it every 5 minutes using the HN API, trying to stay within fair use. It is also easy to tweak if someone wants faster or slower updates.

One part I really like is the "dynamic" README on Hugging Face. It is generated automatically by the code and keeps updating as new commits come in, so you can just open it and quickly see the current state.

The code is still a bit messy right now (I open sourced it together with around 3.6M lines across 100+ other tools, hidden in a corner of GitHub, anyone interested can play Sherlock Holmes and find it :) ), but I will clean it up, and open source as clearer new repository and write a proper blog post explaining how it works.


Wow tamnd that is lovely to hear. I’m so glad you told me it was an inspiration.

Your big download plus quick refreshes is smart. Is your Background in data/AI?

Because i don’t know much about huggingface beyond its a hub for that.


Connecting directly with the author of the project that inspired me is awesome.

Let's collaborate and see how we can make our two projects work together. DuckDB has a feature that can write to SQLite: https://duckdb.org/docs/stable/core_extensions/sqlite. Starting from Parquet files, we could use DuckDB to write into SQLite databases. This could reduce ingress time to around five minutes instead of a week.

If I have some free time this weekend, I would definitely like to contribute to your project. Would you be interested?

As for my background, I focus on data engineering and data architecture. I help clients build very large-scale data pipelines, ranging from near real-time systems (under 10 ms) to large batch processing systems (handling up to 1 billion business transactions per day across thousands of partners). Some of these systems use mathematical models I developed, particularly in graph theory.

Happy to chat.


One of the things that i got interested in from the comments on my show was parquet. Everyone raving about it. Happy to see a project using that today.

Would be happy to connect more :)


If you have time I welcome your contribution.


The way I bundle into SEA is modules that need to be imported from disk (that can't be bundled due to node or wasm modules), is just include them in the assets, and do a "write to tmp, import, delete" flow. It works.

Not saying vfs is bad, just it's not impossible in a few lines of code to set up that. My idea for a simple version of a vfs in node is to use a RAM disk/RAMfs - would that work?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: