Yeah I think one of the things that would be interesting is to see how well it generalizes across tasks. It seems like the existence of pathology foundation models means there is certainly a degree of generalizability (at least across tissues) but I am not too sure yet about generalizability across different modalities (there are some cool biomarker-prediction models though)
going of a tangent but would you say it's worth going to a similarly ranked uni(oxford) if one wants to go into entrepreneurship given its more 'academic' emphasis? as opposed to somewhere like UCSD where it's not as prestigious but close to the tech scene.(bonus points for california weather ha!)
Definitely go to Oxford over UCSD. There’s a world of difference in difficulty to get into, and like the other person says, SD isn’t the biggest tech scene unless biotech is your focus. UC schools are also huge and impersonal, part of what lets them offer decently cheap tuition to in-state students; but if you’re not in-state, I don’t think you’re getting the best value for your money. My answer might change if the alternative were Berkeley.
UCSD is not really near the tech scene, so I wouldn't choose it for that. San Diego is a world away from the Bay Area. The weather in SD is definitely the best in the world, though.
The optimal path for someone in your position is to go to Oxford, then get a job/do a master's at Stanford.
a direct messaging system, there've been countless times when I've wanted to ask a poster some (unrelated) questions, but they have no contact details.
yeah scratch, visual basic and swift playgrounds got me into it. Great for piquing interest, especially being able to see projects others built and interact with them.